首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of an immunochemical assay for plasma fibrinogen and a turbidimetric thrombin clotting technique to discriminate hyperlipidaemic patients from healthy controls.
【2h】

Comparison of an immunochemical assay for plasma fibrinogen and a turbidimetric thrombin clotting technique to discriminate hyperlipidaemic patients from healthy controls.

机译:比较血浆纤维蛋白原的免疫化学分析法和浊度凝血酶凝血技术以区分高脂血症患者和健康对照者。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Plasma samples from patients attending a lipid clinic (n = 14) and healthy control subjects (n = 21) were assayed for fibrinogen using an immunochemical method (radial immunodiffusion) and a turbidimetric assay based on the thrombin clotting technique. The patients had significantly higher plasma fibrinogen concentrations than controls by both methods, but there was significant overlap between the two groups when fibrinogen was assayed by the thrombin clotting technique; there was almost complete separation of the two groups using the immunochemical assay. This difference in overlap could not be attributed to the presence or absence of fibrinogen degradation products. These findings may have important implications for the choice of method for determining plasma fibrinogen when assays are used for the assessment of cardiovascular risk. It is recommended that plasma fibrinogen should be assayed by both an immuno-chemical and a thrombin clotting method.
机译:使用免疫化学方法(放射免疫扩散)和基于凝血酶凝结技术的比浊法,对来自脂质诊所(n = 14)和健康对照(n = 21)患者的血浆样品中的纤维蛋白原进行了测定。两种方法患者的血浆纤维蛋白原浓度均显着高于对照组,但是当通过凝血酶凝固技术测定纤维蛋白原时,两组之间存在显着重叠。使用免疫化学分析法将两组几乎完全分离。重叠的差异不能归因于纤维蛋白原降解产物的存在与否。当使用测定法评估心血管风险时,这些发现可能对确定血浆纤维蛋白原的方法的选择具有重要意义。建议血浆纤维蛋白原应通过免疫化学和凝血酶凝固法进行测定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号